Archive for March, 2005

28
Mar
05

unveil their fears

 

Muslim girls unveil their fears

 

By Elizabeth C Jones


Although France has banned religious symbols from schools, some of the country’s 1,200 veiled Muslim schoolgirls are still searching for a compromise.

Iptiseim (left), Siheme and Touria (right)

Some of the veiled schoolgirls meet regularly to discuss their strategy

“French education”, declares a trim man behind a big desk, “aims to allow each person, irrespective of their religion or their community, the chance to start on an equal footing and receive the same education.”

This impassioned defence of French secularism comes from Raymond Scieux, headmaster of Lycee Eugene Delacroix in Drancy, a suburb northeast of Paris.

For much of last year, Scieux and other French headmasters, had the unenviable task of guiding staff and students through a new French law banning all conspicuous religious symbols from state schools.

The law is widely supported by the French, who regard secularism as a pillar of the Republic.

No crucifixes, no skullcaps, no Islamic headscarves. There can now be nothing within the walls of a state school that can immediately identify a religious affiliation.

Dispute

Headmaster Raymond Scieux

Raymond Scieux sees no place for religion in French schools

From the beginning, the French law was perceived by most of France’s five million Muslims to be an ill-concealed attempt to ban veils from the classroom.

“There’s a lot of tension in the Islamic community which feels targeted,” Scieux admits, “but it’s actually applicable to all religions”.

Between May and October of last year, the BBC filmed at Lycee Eugene Delacroix with people from both sides of the debate.

Teachers, their headmaster and pupils were caught up in an emotional drama that would ultimately decide whether or not a handful of veiled girls would be expelled for wearing the Islamic headscarf in school.

Personal choice

“What does this veil mean to me?” asks Touria, a softly-spoken and serious pupil at Delacroix. “It’s part of who I am. It’s not just some bit of fabric on my head. It’s everything.

 

People say that it’s the women who wear the veil that are submissive… but I think it is those women who are submissive

Touria, student

“Looking back on it, I can’t imagine taking it off. What I’m wearing today I consider the minimum.”

What Touria is wearing is a bandanna, a simple scarf that covers her hair but not her ears or neck. She says she prefers to wear this so she doesn’t draw attention to herself or her religion.

Touria is one of five veiled girls from Delacroix who are meeting once a week in a friend’s flat to discuss their strategy to fight a strict interpretation of the law at their school.

Others come to the meetings too, including a handful of anti-law teachers and non-Muslim schoolfriends.

Their fear is that the headmaster will decide to ban all headcoverings, so they’re looking for a compromise.

Secular France

The headmaster, however, is under pressure from the majority of his teachers, who want a total ban on headcoverings.

He has decided to hold a public meeting at the school term so all interested parties can air their views.

This law is here to protect those girls who are compelled to do things they don’t want to do

Eric Finot, teacher

Among the speakers at the public meeting is Eric Finot, a history teacher at Delacroix with strong views on the subject.

As he rises to speak, he says he wants to address the veiled girls in particular.

“We are only asking you to abide by the principle of secularism,” he says.

To the anger of the girls, he then adds: “We are thinking of those girls who we could maybe protect a little bit at school… This law is here to protect those girls who are compelled to do things they don’t want to do – not to be forced into marriage, not to wear the veil.”

Separate issues

For the veiled girls, the public meeting confirmed their worst fears. The pro-law lobby was mixing everything Islamic in the same pot: Sharia law, forced marriage, veils.

They understood very well the feminist arguments condemning many aspects of their faith, but all of them insisted that they were under no pressure at home to wear the veil.

Khadidja (left) and Iptiseim (right)

Iptiseim (right) believes France wants to de-veil Muslim girls in order to veil its problems

In fact, quite the opposite. Their parents would prefer to them to de-veil than jeopardise their education.

Touria adds: “People say that it’s the women who wear the veil that are submissive… but I think it is those women who are submissive, because it is what men want, women half naked.”

As the veiled girls agonised over whether or not they would de-veil, their headmaster became convinced that a compromise was possible.

When Lycee Eugene Delacroix opened for the new school year, it was one of the only schools in France to allow girls to wear a discreet bandanna.

But for veiled girls like Iptiseim, this was not the outcome she had hoped for.

“Now that I’m wearing a bandanna in school,” she says, “when I come out I can’t wait to put my veil back on. It was always important, but now even more so.”

24
Mar
05

Two German States Reject Hijab Ban

Two German States Reject Hijab Ban

 

A library photo of a hijab-clad teacher in a German school.

By Ahmed Al-Matboli, IOL Staff

BERLIN, March 24, 2005 (IslamOnline.net) – The legislatures in two German states have turned down proposals by the opposition Christian Democratic Party to ban Muslim school teachers from wearing hijab.

The parliament of Nordrhein-Westfalen, western Germany, rejected the party’s request as having no legal merit.

The Christian Democratic party claimed that hijab places woman at a lower status and was a political symbol not entrenched in the Muslims’ holy book, the Noble Qur’an.

Thomas Kufen, the party’s immigration affairs officer, alleged that disputes could emerge in schools over the issue of hijab and that a legislation was needed.

The party, yet, said nuns should be exempted for any ban on religious dress codes.

The Socialist and the Green parties, the ruling coalition, as well as the Free Democratic Party had opposed the proposals.

They particularly took issue at the Christian Democratic Party’s attempt to exempt nuns’ wear from the ban as a violation of the constitution which demands equal treatment for citizens irrespective of their religious affiliations.

Islam sees hijab as an obligatory code of dress, not a religious symbol displaying one’s affiliations – unlike the symbolic Christian crucifixes or Jewish Kappas.

Hindering Integration

The parliament of the south-western state of Reinland-Pfalz also turned down a proposal by Christian Democratic Party leader Christoph Bohr to ban hijab.

The Socialist, Green and Free Democratic parties have voted against the motion, accusing the party of religious discrimination.

Doris Ahnen, the education minister of Reinland-Pfalz, condemned the ban request, saying it would obstruct the integration of Muslim women into society.

The education affairs official in the Green Party, Nils Fichmann, also opened fire on the Christian Democratic Party, whose leaders had described hijab-clad women as “enemies of the constitution”.

The Green party is the only political party that rejects the hijab ban in principle.

Sylvia Lohrmann, the leader of the party’s parliamentary bloc, stressed that the issue should not even be open to discussion.

The Free Democrats, however, rejected the hijab ban because it should have also include the head gear of nuns in order to avoid any discrimination.

Germany’s highest tribunal, the constitutional court, ruled in 2003 that Baden-Wuerttemberg was wrong to forbid a Muslim teacher from wearing hijab in the classroom.

But it said Germany’s 16 regional states could issue new legislations to ban it if they believe hijab would influence children.

The states of Hamburg, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt and Thuringen still allow teachers to wear hijab.

In addition to Baden-Wuerttemberg, the states of Saarland and Niedersachsen ban teachers from showing any religious or political affiliation, including hijab.

Another state, Hessen, made amendments to its school laws, banning teachers from wearing any symbols of religious or political nature while allowing them a limited right to put on Christian or western symbols.

In Bavaria, laws were enforced in 2004 banning teachers from wearing religious symbols that are not harmonious with Christian cultural values.

The state of Brandenburg made the same amendments in 2003.

For Now

IOL’s Correspondent cautions that the parliaments’ rejection of the hijab ban proposal might only be temporary and the controversy could surface again.

Nordrhein-Westfalen’s Education Minister Ute Schafer, of the Socialist Party, told parliament members on March 17 that the number of hijab-clad teachers was very few and the issue should not be raised “at present”.

Dorothee Danner, a Socialist lawmaker, said her colleagues remain divided on the broader issue of hijab in schools.

Some of the party’s MPs support a ban on hijab, while others believe the issue should not be addressed “now”.

Danner, however, expected the issue to be raised again in the coming legislative session.

A recent report by the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF) unveiled that Muslim minorities across Europe have been experiencing growing distrust, hostility and discrimination since the 9/11 attacks.

Muslim organizations have reported that discrimination against Muslim women wearing hijab peaked since September 11, the report said.

Source: IslamOnline.net




Pages

Top Clicks

  • None

 

March 2005
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Sep »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Blog Stats

  • 4,266 hits